AllBestEssays.com - All Best Essays, Term Papers and Book Report
Search

The Transition from the Old Testament to the New Testament

Essay by   •  October 31, 2013  •  Research Paper  •  2,339 Words (10 Pages)  •  1,850 Views

Essay Preview: The Transition from the Old Testament to the New Testament

Report this essay
Page 1 of 10

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY

INTERTESTAMENT PERIOD PAPER

A RESEARCH PAPER

SUBMITTED TO DR. BOB KENDALL

FOR NEW TESTAMENT INTRODUCTION

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT

OF THE MASTERS OF PASTORAL COUNSELLING DEGREE

IN THE LIBERTY UNVERSITY SEMINARY

BY

JASON MOOORE

OMAHA, NE

OCTOBER 2013

INTRODUCTION

For many people the transition from the Old Testament to the New Testament is strange and considerably confusing. Without knowing what took place in the "silent years", it very well can be a difficult task to make the leap from the Old Testament to the New Testament. The Old Testament world looks and sounds completely different from the world the New Testament describes, however, the same spirit inspired the writings of both canons. It must be known to the reader that the Old and New Testaments complement each other. In order to get the full understanding and the entire picture of God's Word, you must understand them together. But, in order to understand them together, there is the time period of 400 years that are not included. This 400 year time frame plays a huge part in understanding how the two different worlds of the Old and New Testaments come together to make a comprehensive story.

The "Intertestamental Period" is a short amount of time in relativity to the rest of Biblical history, but this short time frame sets the stage for the New Testament. The period between the Old and New Testament can very well be called a transition period that introduces the "Gentile" world firmly in the Jewish culture. The Old Testament law and style of worship would never be the same, and the prophets of the Old Testament had predicted as such. This time period also encompassed the same period of the Second Temple which ranged from 530 BCE to 70AD.

At the end of the book of Malachi, (c. 420BCE) we find the nation of Israel back in the land of Palestine after the Babylonian captivity. They are not on under their own rule as the Persian and Medio-Persian Empire was still in firm control of the area during this time but they are relatively free to worship as He commanded. "The fact that the Persians were Zoroastrians, worshipping the one invisible God, who they believed was Spirit and whose symbol was fire, meant that they felt a kinship with the Jews as with no other. They had, therefore, on the whole favoured the reconstruction of Jerusalem and the Temple." (Lambert 2010)

SILENCE WITHOUT SILENCE

"It is often assumed by many people that the Jewish people in the 1st century were following Moses, and following him very strictly. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Yes, that society in which Christ taught was the most "religious" ever known to man, but it was a far cry from the simple religious doctrines advocated by Moses." (Martin 1986)

How in a manner of approximately 400 years did the worship of YHWH go from what Moses passed on to a religion that was nearly unrecognizable? Even though, in Biblical time, 400 years is not a long time, it was plenty of time for cultures to infiltrate the Jewish lifestyles and nearly take over everything they did, said and believed in. When the book of Malachi closed, the line of Aaronic priests were still worshipping and carrying on the rites as they had so been ordered to do by the Law of Moses.

At the height of the Persian Empire, Philip of Macedon came to power in what we know as Greece. He united all of the lands of Greece and became the ruler. The son of Philip is known as "Alexander the Great". In 330 B.C., Alexander led the Greek armies into battle with the Persians and ultimately conquered them. A year later, Alexander the Great led his armies towards Egypt on his way planned to take hold of Jerusalem. As the Greeks approached Jerusalem, the high priest rode out to Alexander and told him about the prophecies of Daniel. The report of Josephus, the Jewish historian, says that Alexander was able to see in the predictions that he would be the one responsible for conquering the world. He promised that no harm would come to Jerusalem.

Alexander died in 323 B.C., but in the decade of his rule, he completely transformed the culture. All of the areas he ruled became "Hellenized", meaning the Greek culture was completely united. "From then on Hellenism permeated every part of the old empire. Greek became the common and universal language, and the old Semitic languages fell slowly into a kind of disuse. Greek thought, customs and traditions were everywhere adopted. Upper class society became Hellenized. Great changes came in the fields of art, philosophy, and science, as well as religion. So Hellenized did the ancient world become, that to the true Jews all Gentiles were "Greeks"!!" (Lambert 2010)

The four generals that led Alexander's armies divided his empire between them as Alexander had no heir. One of the generals was Ptolemy, who controlled Egypt and the north African countries and another general was Seleucus, who controlled Syria to the north of Palestine. The book of Daniel prophesizes with great accuracy about these events in chapter eleven verse four. Under Ptolemy, Palestine suffered being caught in the middle of many battles between the "Kings of the North".

After the high priest Jaddua died, Onias became high priest and his son Simon the Just succeeded him. Simon the Just was very much against the Hellenization of the Jewish culture and tried to bring the people back to the true worship of the Lord. Simon the Just died in 291 B.C. and only had an infant son so Simon's brother, Eleazar, assumed the role of high priest. It was during this time that the LXX was created and was influential in the acceptance of the Greek culture by the Jewish population. "In later days the strictly orthodox Rabbis of the Pharisaic school bitterly regretted this translation, and declared that it was "as great a calamity as the making of the golden calf." This was because some of its renderings were rather paraphrases than translations, and were of such a character as to be a great aid to the Hellenizing Jews in their efforts to introduce the new learning and to overthrow the so-called orthodox teaching." (Ironsides)

The Greek influence was becoming stronger in the land of Palestine.

...

...

Download as:   txt (13.2 Kb)   pdf (153.1 Kb)   docx (14.5 Kb)  
Continue for 9 more pages »
Only available on AllBestEssays.com