Criminal Justice

The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, are brought to court to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in neutral forum (Schmallger, Siegel, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be considered to become a court, it must have a proper legal authority and have the guild lines within the Constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of "deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact" is known as adjudication, or "the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case" (Schmallger, Siegel, & Worrall, 2011).

Following this further, there are different types of courts and different levels so it is very important that people understand and know the differences between civil and criminal courts. Civil courts focus on deciding on cases that involves private parties and criminal courts focus on offenders that are assumed to be guilty of breaking the law.

Furthermore, the dual court system is the separation among the federal and state court system. The dual court system permits the federal administration restricted access to each jurisdiction problems and state law is not allowed to be involved in the federal judicial system, without some type of encounter at state or federal levels. Federal courts have the authority to resolve only the cases in which the Constitution allows them to have the power over. These types of courts are to be found in the bigger only; specific cases are allowed to be received within federal courts. For instance, the cases that are allowed to be viewed in federal courts are cases that include the United States government and other officers who are sued. The dual court system is not only part of the story, each level there is a different court chain of command. States often have limited jurisdiction courts, such as traffic courts, trial courts, and appellate courts, and supreme courts (Schmallger, Siegel, & Worrall, 2011). Each trial court adjudicates different offenses, appellate court consider different matters depending on where they lie in the court hierarchy. Appeals from state courts can sometimes be heard in the federal courts. Higher level courts can control the actions and decisions of lower courts but not the other way. Although the clear difficulty, each court has its place. The key concentration of the court system is to maintain the law, shield citizens, and their rights and resolving disputes reinforcing social forms (The White House).

Moreover, the legal codes are forms that have the law significance to shield a wide-ranging structure of the laws; the specific

...